9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h
.com
.wtc7.net
Home
Background
Attack
Aftermath
Evidence
Misinformation
Analysis
Memorial
Search
Essays
Reviews
Talks
Building 7
WTC
Pentagon
NIST
Interviews
FAQs
conspiracy
demolition
pentagon
Materials
WTC flyers
WTC posters
Papers
Resources
letters
web
books
videos
webcasts
mirrors
Site Guide
Contents
Glossary
Site Map
Recent
Highlights
About
Contact
Contribute
DONATE
V 1.289
Copyright 2003-2008,
911Research.WTC7.netsite last updated: 1/6/09
fair use notice

9-11 Research

An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001

DISCLAIMER
9-11 Research does not promote incivility,
junk science, or 'no-jetliner' claims.




9-11 Research is an investigation and analysis of the events of September 11, 2001. It archives physical evidence of the crimes, such as photographs and videos, provides referenced reports of events relating to the crime, and offers detailed analysis of theories of the attack, especially those advanced by the official FEMA and NIST investigations.

Widely recognized for the quality of work it presents, 9-11 Research has been deceptively portrayed by media icons such as Scientific American and Popular Mechanics as promoting the very methods and ideas it works to expose as smokescreens to genuine investigation of the crimes of 9/11/01.

We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.

Is this story true? Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.


9-11RESEARCH PROVIDES FACTUAL, REASONED ANALYSIS
OF THE 9/11 ATTACK
* EXPOSING FALLACIES OF THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

RECENT: Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for Energetic Materials by Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones

RECENT: Public Comments on WTC 7 Draft Reports -- independent scientists respond to NIST's WTC 7 report

Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century -- NIST's Report evades the very question it purported to investigate: what caused the total destruction of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers?

Review of 'A New Standard For Deception: The NIST WTC Report' -- A Presentation by Kevin Ryan

* EXAMINING FLAWED THEORIES PRESENTED AS 9/11 TRUTH

The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows -- exposing errors underpinning the "no-jetliner" theories

9-11 Research focuses on the facts of the attack and analysis of the official explanation.
The companion site 911Review.com provides a broader view, including historical context and the use of disinformation to conceal the truth.
articles
attack
mythology
coverup
911Review.com
means
precedent
motive
disinfo
errors

9-11 Research recommends the following organizations for their rational and science-based analysis of the attack. See the Architects & Engineers and Scholars sites for regularly updated listings of educational events.
Architects and Engineers
for 9/11 Truth
Journal of
9/11 Studies
Scholars for
9/11 Truth & Justice

page last modified: 2009-01-06