9-11 Research
An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001
|
9-11 Research does not promote incivility, junk science, or 'no-jetliner' claims. |
 |
|
9-11 Research is an investigation and analysis of the events of September 11, 2001. It archives physical evidence of the crimes, such as photographs and videos, provides referenced reports of events relating to the crime, and offers detailed analysis of theories of the attack, especially those advanced by the official FEMA and NIST investigations. Widely recognized for the quality of work it presents, 9-11 Research has been deceptively portrayed by media icons such as Scientific American and Popular Mechanics as promoting the very methods and ideas it works to expose as smokescreens to genuine investigation of the crimes of 9/11/01. |
We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.
Is this story true? Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences. Questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.
NEW: Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for Energetic Materials by Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones NEW: Public Comments on WTC 7 Draft Reports -- independent scientists respond to NIST's WTC 7 report RECENT: 911 Plotters Bury the Evidence by Michael Green -- Green examines the recent attempt to pin the 2001 anthrax attacks on an army scientist Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century -- NIST's Report evades the very question it purported to investigate: what caused the total destruction of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers? NIST's World Trade Center FAQ Review of 'A New Standard For Deception: The NIST WTC Report' -- A Presentation by Kevin Ryan
The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows -- exposing errors underpinning the "no-jetliner" theories |
|
|